AIOFP to take Govt to court over grandfathering
The Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) has hired a QC to represent it before the High Court, where it hopes to argue that proposals to ban grandfathered revenue are unconstitutional.
The group’s executive director, Peter Johnston, believed that its chances were “better than even”, saying that constitutional restrictions requiring the acquisition of property meant that particular remuneration structures could only be band prospectively.
It planned to use comments by then-Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, to this effect to support its case.
The AIOFP didn’t clarify however, what its legal argument would be in relation to the proposed bans taking effect going forward. A statement from its legal team said that it was taking advice on a potential challenge to the validity of the proposed amendments to grandfathering without compensation to advisers, but it was unclear why such an argument would have standing before the High Court.
Johnston said the push to ban grandfathering was based on “trash” claims by consumer groups and institutional lobbying, and had become a “political football” used by Shorten and Scott Morrison to “grasp some political kudos”.
AUTHOR
Hannah Wootton
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
