AIOFP questions associations efforts over LIF
The Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) has questioned the ability of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) to act in the interests of advisers and will argue against the adoption of the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).
AIOFP, executive director, Peter Johnston, said in a statement released to members there was also a ‘deep rift' between the two adviser associations and the Financial Services Council (FSC) over the specifics of the LIF.
Johnston's claim for a split between the three parties is based on "a recent discussion with a leading product manufacturer executive".
In his statement Johnston stated "the FPA and AFA are livid with the FSC over being manipulated to meet the FSC political objectives to heavily tilt the market in favour of direct internet/telemarketing sales and a return to in house institutional conflicted advisers at the expense of independent advisers, small business and choice for consumers."
Johnston has previously stated the three groups acted in concert due to pressure from institutional interests and supporters, which was in turn rebuffed by the FPA which stated only practitioner members had voting rights in the association.
He claimed the FSC needed the support of the FPA and AFA to show the Federal Government there was widespread industry support for the LIF with Johnston claiming the FPA and AFA ignored members "and supported a heavily institutional weighted outcome that threatens the survival of the independent adviser and disadvantages consumers".
"The question remains as to whether the FPA and AFA are naïve, incompetent or just committed to acting in the best interests of the majority of their members or revenue source?"
Johnston repeated previous claims that advisers were being used for political purposes and the LIF outcomes would not be in their best interest stating "there is only one way to stop this happening…….."
"We will be emailing every member of Federal Parliament today with our views on why the FSC/FPA/AFA proposal to the Minister disadvantages consumers, will destroy small business and exacerbate the Nations chronic underinsurance position."
FPA chief executive Mark Rantall said his association would not comment on rumours, but had “worked tirelessly in consultation with our members and other associations to get to an agreed position that will positively reform the industry”.
“There is currently a lot of unhelpful ‘noise’ in the industry and actions to the contrary of this process, particularly from self-interested parties, are unhelpful both for the industry and for consumers,” Rantall said.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
Money Management examines the share price of financial advice licensees over one year to 31 March, with M&A actions in the final quarter having a positive effect for two licensees.
A $3.5 million settlement for victims of Melissa Caddick has been approved by the Federal Court following an initial agreement last December.
The Reserve Bank of Australia has delivered its first rate decision since the introduction of a new board structure last month.
Digital advice provider Otivo has launched an interactive tool, powered by artificial intelligence and Otivo’s own advice engine, to help answer client questions.
