AIOFP criticises unsupportive younger advisers

AIOFP FASEA education

13 December 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) has criticised younger advisers who do not support Labor’s proposed education exemption for older advisers, accusing them of being the “Christmas Grinch”.

Shadow financial services minister, Stephen Jones, announced Labor would grant an exemption for advisers with over 10 years of experience and a clean track record from the tertiary education requirements, which had found support from industry bodies.

Peter Johnston, AIOFP executive director, said he was disappointed by the reaction from younger advisers who did not qualify for the exemption and had done or were required to do the education requirements.

“It is unfortunate that some elitist younger financial advisers (EYFA) cannot find any compassion or patience for the older adviser who may not have had the opportunity for a traditional university style of education but has life experience, arguably the most important qualification to have,” Johnston said.

“How many times do you hear university graduates say ‘most of what I studied at uni has no relevance to my career’ – it is the subsequent university of life training that makes them successful and relevant in their chosen career.

“That is why new entrants have at least 12 months of training before being allowed to give advice to consumers, the curriculum content they studied for over four years is largely irrelevant.

“The EYFA fraternity should stop being the Christmas Grinch and demonstrate some respect to experienced advisers of all descriptions who have been the backbone of this industry for over 40 years and have performed to a high level.”

Although he said he supported the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority exam, it still needed to be re-worked next year under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

“Whilst most theoretically agree a FASEA exam is a good idea it is time to adjust its original objective and reflect that in the exam content,” Johnston said.

“It must move away from trying to intimidate any adviser out of the industry to being specific to the adviser’s field of expertise and testing the relevant ethical/technical information.

“It also needs to be set by an industry panel not an academic who knows little about our industry.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 6 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 4 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 week ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

6 days 6 hours ago