AIOFP calls on advisers to get clients’ to petition

AIOFP FASEA peter johnston education professionalisation financial planning

20 August 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) has called on advisers to petition the Government regarding the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority’s (FASEA’s) reforms by utilising support from clients.

The suggested petition template provided by the organisation read: “I support my FINANCIAL ADVISER [name] … and appreciate the work and advice I have received. I do not agree with the actions and direction of FASEA and it will influence my voting decision at the next election.”

AIOFP hoped to get 100 clients from 10,000 advisers to sign the petition, as it said that “1,000,000 signatures … is an excellent start to get attention from politicians”.

“It is time for all advisers to reunite and use our collective numbers and political clout to seek change to our professions greatest ever threat. Over the next six to nine months there is a political window of opportunity with a federal election looming, a struggling Turnbull Government and a damaged FASEA brand to challenge,” AIOFP executive director, Peter Johnston, wrote in an email sent out to advisers urging their help with the petition.

“Numbers are our greatest asset and we need ALL to get involved to give the best chance of success. We have potentially 25,000 advisers, 50,000 support staff and 5 million clients, a significant mass of political capital if it can be harnessed and coordinated into effective action and this starts with you,” the email also said.

In a paper sent to advisers in the same email, the organisation outlined some key questions that it believed FASEA must answer, pledging that “these matters will be pursued through the Courts if necessary”.

The questions it said needed to be answered by the FASEA board and Government were:

  1. How can single women with dependent children comply with these proposed conditions?
  2. How can people who even have a full-time working partner comply with these proposed conditions when responsible for a dependent child’s supervision when working part time?
  3. Where else in any other western civilisation are past completed relevant qualifications and experience not recognised for any occupation? and
  4. Why does the FASEA’s ethos contradict basic human rights and the nation’s best interests?
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS