AIOFP blocks PI cover

financial planners mortgage insurance property professional indemnity australian securities and investments commission van eyk chief executive morningstar lonsec

5 July 2007
| By Liam Egan |

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) is to exclude professional indemnity (PI) cover to members who invest client money in property funds without a minimum investment grade rating.

The move was triggered by the collapse of Bridgecorp Finance, owing an estimated $24 million to investors, as well as that of Westpoint and Fincorp, according to AIOFP chief executive Peter Johnston.

Ironically, the move comes in the same week PI cover for financial planners officially became mandatory — by way of the promulgation of Corporations Regulation 7.6.02AAA.

Johnston said its brokers have been asked to restructure the PI cover the AIOFP offers members to exclude investments in property products without at least a three star investment grade or equivalent rating from either Lonsec, Morningstar, or van Eyk.

Johnston said the move was intended as a disincentive for its 1,700 member planners in 140 practices to get involved with property funds where there are conflicts of interests between management and third parties.

Johnston said AIOFP members should not be in a relationship with a property fund where there’s any relationship with someone raising money and then someone investing money.

Bridgecorp, Westpoint, Fincorp, Estate Mortgage, Telford and others are examples of where conflicts between management and third parties led to the collapse of the fund.

“These funds go under [and] financial planners invariably get the blame as the ‘soft target’, and everyone else runs for political cover.”

Johnston said the move was also intended to try to mitigate all of the risks that lower the cost of PI cover, as insurance always increases when there are major calamities in the marketplace.

It is also intended to “assist both ASIC [Australian Securities and Investments Commission] and consumers by starving these conflicted relationships of capital”.

“Unfortunately for the public’s ultimate protection, ASIC are restrained by Australia’s Constitution to take total control of the property market, leaving loopholes for group’s like Westpoint to exist.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 3 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 3 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS