AIMA concerned over short selling ban
Kim Ivey
The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) has expressed concerns that the ban on short selling instituted by the Australian Securities and InvestmentsCommission (ASIC) will worsen market volatility instead of restoring financial stability.
AIMA chairman Kim Ivey said: “While AIMA is supportive of regulators’ efforts around the world to restore stability to financial markets, we are concerned this total ban on short selling in Australia may actually have the opposite effect.
“We’re concerned that, without any short selling, price discovery for many ASX (Australian Securities Exchange) stocks is actually in disequilibrium and as a consequence, many stocks will exhibit increased volatility.”
AIMA said in a statement that it believed that ASIC acted in haste and without consultation by banning all short selling, extending beyond the actions of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the United Kingdom. The SEC and FSA only banned naked short selling and restricted other forms of short selling in a limited number of financial stocks.
“We can expect severe outcomes from this short selling ban — investors who want to adopt capital protection strategies either through short selling or through derivative instruments such as CFDs (contracts for difference) are unable to do so. Companies [that] want to raise equity funds will be unable to do so… equity capital raising is now either on a ‘best efforts’ basis or at a complete standstill in Australia.”
AIMA urged ASIC to speed up its market manipulation review and separate legitimate short selling activities from the illegal act of spreading market rumours.
AIMA is working to convince regulators around the world to restore short selling in the market.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
