Agribusiness advice clarified

taxation/australian-financial-services/stock-market/

28 June 2007
| By Glenn Freeman |
image
image image
expand image

Kathy Bowler

A new CPA Australia guidance note outlines how its members can assist clients with agribusiness managed investment schemes (MIS).

It explains the parameters of advising in this area for both Australian Financial Services Licensed (AFSL) and non-licensed members, and also identifies some of the key comparators used in distinguishing between agribusiness schemes, including the risks associated with them.

According to Kath Bowler, CPA Australia financial planning policy adviser: “It highlights the key factors that people need to take into account if they are advising in this area. Because we represent licensed and unlicensed members, we take every opportunity to remind them where the line is.”

One of the primary aspects of agribusiness MISs it highlights is the distinction between forestry and non-forestry related schemes, with the often vastly different return timeframes significantly impacting their various tax treatments.

“It affects the capital gain, the timing of the returns. We’re just trying to draw attention to the different features of these products, and in doing so that helps to explain the changing tax treatments as well,” Bowler said.

The guidance note looks first at how CPA members can decide whether an agribusiness MIS is an appropriate product investment for their client, and then highlights the various features and risks of the assets.

“It’s looking at the category generally, and then the specifics of one versus another.

“We’re also trying to draw attention to the risks that are specific to this class, because sometimes they’re not really discussed É they’re often talked about as high risk or alternative, but [it looks at] what makes these assets riskier than investing in the stock market,” Bowler said.

These risks include the much longer time horizon relative to many other assets, taxation risks, agricultural risks and the lack of a secondary market or index for agricultural MISs.

“You can’t see how these assets are tracking on a regular basis. There’s no index and no indication of whether management is looking after your product or not,” Bowler said.

“Often, you may not know the outcome of that until the end, until it’s too late. And with the lack of secondary market É if you do discover there’s a problem, you can’t get rid of them.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo