AFSLs warned not to hire bankrupts
Australian financial services licensees (AFSLs) should think twice before employing someone with a conviction or bankruptcy as they can threaten compliance with a licensee’s obligations, according to The Fold Legal.
In a blog, head of licensing, Sonia Cruz wrote that employees with a history of bankruptcy or conviction could place the licensee at risk as they may not be of good fame and character, and they may be tempted to breach financial services laws or behave dishonestly.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) can ban any person it believes to not be of ‘good fame and character’, and it can suspend an AFSL if a major representative of a licensee is banned, or if ASIC believes the licensee will not comply with general licence obligations.
Cruz also warned undischarged bankrupts could also create issues for licensees because they would have additional conflicts of interest.
“Even the best person can be motivated to behave dishonestly if they find themselves in difficult circumstances,” Cruz wrote.
“Undischarged bankrupts could be tempted to misappropriate client funds, so they shouldn’t be employed in any role that requires them to handle money or that gives them an opportunity or ability to misappropriate client monies.”
Furthermore, undischarged bankrupts cannot act as directors, responsible managers, company secretaries, or be involved in the management of a company. They can only undertake these roles once the bankruptcy is discharged.
However, they can be employed in other roles while still bankrupt.
Recommended for you
David Sipina has been sentenced to three years under an intensive correction order for his role in the unlicensed Courtenay House financial services.
As AFSLs endeavour to meet their breach reporting obligations, a legal expert has emphasised why robust documentation will prove fruitful, particularly in the face of potential regulatory investigations.
Betashares has named the top Australian suburbs with the highest spare cash flow, shining a light on where financial advisers could eye out potential clients.
A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 for a client.