Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

AFSLs warned against unfair contracts

accounting/legal/finance/

6 April 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

Australian financial services licensees (AFSLs) need to ensure they avoid ‘unfair contract terms’ for their authorised representatives to avoid a court deeming it unfair and declaring it void, The Fold Legal warned.

Paralegal, Lydia Cartensen wrote in a blog that if a court decides a contract term is unfair, common law principles would apply instead.

“If you didn’t want your contract to apply, you wouldn’t have bothered drafting it in the first place, so it’s worth taking a few moments to think about whether your drafting would actually hold up if it did come before a court,” Cartensen wrote.

She identified common terms that could be deemed unfair either because they were heavy handed, unilateral, or went beyond what was needed to protect the licensee’s legitimate business interests, and how to fix them.

Indemnity clauses that favoured one party over the other and failed to incorporate principles of causation and proportionate liability should include proportionate liability principles in favour of the party providing the indemnity, she wrote.

Termination clauses that would allow the contract to be terminated for breach even where the breach can be fixed should allow the authorised representative to repair the breach before the licensee can terminate for breach.

Termination clauses that would require a party to destroy records which would interfere with tax and compliance requirements to maintain complete records should allow restricted access to and/or retention of records for suitable purposes.

Cartensen also noted set off clauses that would allow a party to deduct their indemnity claim from fees payable under the contract.

“Even where the claim is covered by insurance, insurers may view the deduction as a financial loss and refuse to pay for it. Make this clause fairer by providing that claims that are covered by insurance cannot be deducted from fees payable,” she wrote.

Cartensen noted ‘unfair contract terms’ was discussed widely in 2016, with the Australia Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) working with some industries to remove unfair contract terms.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 18 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND