The AFSL regime should not be 'one size fits all'

3 March 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA) has urged the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to consider stockbrokers as distinct from financial planners and not apply a “one size fits all" approach.

In its submission to the Interim Report A Financial Services Legislation, SAFAA’s chief executive, Judith Fox, endorsed an Australian Financials Services License (AFSL) regime that had a very wide scope and covered a wide variety of industry participants.

But she said that it was worrying that Government regulation seemed to assume all advisers were financial planners.

“This disadvantages stockbrokers and investment advice firms and their clients, as well as other specialised advice services (for example, accountants providing advice to SMSFs),” Fox said.

“It is important that regulators and government understand the way the stockbroking and investment advice industry works and fits within the broader financial advice service ecosystem.”

Fox said SAFAA was supportive of principles-based regulation but that it was important to balance it with prescription.

She said the organisation of stockbrokers did not share views held by other parts of financial services sectors on a number of issues including individual licensing, the general advice definition, changing the wholesale investor test and separating product from advice.

“Individual licensing applies a financial planning lens to financial services legislation and would require our members to squeeze into a framework that does not suit them or their clients,” Fox said.

“If the issue of individual licensing is included in the final terms of reference of the Quality of Advice Review, SAFAA will be putting forward our members’ views.”

SAFAA noted that there had been suggestions that general advice should be renamed as ‘information’ or ‘product sales information’.

“Calls for a change in the definition of the term general advice is one example of where a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to financial services regulation does not work for stockbrokers and investment advisers and we will be raising this issue in the Quality of Advice Review,” Fox said.

“Given the significant implications for stockbrokers, investment advisers and their clients, should any change to the wholesale investor test be introduced, it is important that any call for change be supported by evidence.

“Before embarking on any further reform we consider that is important to seek the views of wholesale clients who will be impacted by any change.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 5 days ago