AFSL acquisitions loom in grandfathering equation
Financial planning companies looking to avoid the fall-out from the changed grandfathering arrangements can do so via the acquisition of Australian Financial Services Licences (AFSLs), but the risks and costs might be higher than they are willing to meet.
That is the assessment of two dealer group heads - Premium Wealth Management’s Paul Harding-Davis and Paragem’s Ian Knox, both of whom suggested that the acquisition of a licence would not trigger the changes to client status which would curtail the grandfathering provisions for individual planners.
However both men said that companies looking to acquire AFSLs would need to be prepared to devote considerable time and money to undertaking appropriate due diligence in the knowledge that they would be acquiring any problems attaching to the licence.
“It represents a way of dealing with the grandfathering issue, but it can entail some big risks which in turn would require some significant due diligence,” Harding-Davis said.
Knox said such an approach would impact the carrying value of an AFSL and agreed with Harding-Davis that considerable due diligence would be required to effectively avoid purchasing any problems associated with a particular licence.
The key financial planning organisations are continuing to lobby the Treasury over the grandfathering provisions, arguing that on the current interpretation the provisions are anti-competitive.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
