AFCA confirms user-pays funding model
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f77bb/f77bb40efd100315e48317f3dd0fbfbedf4b84c2" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f77bb/f77bb40efd100315e48317f3dd0fbfbedf4b84c2" alt="image"
The new Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) user-pays funding model will be introduced from 1 July after being approved by the AFCA board.
This would see the vast majority of firms pay the same or less in fees while the 10% of ‘heavy impact’ firms would see fees that fairly reflect that fact.
Overall, 95% of licensed financial firm members of the AFCA external dispute resolution scheme would only pay their annual registration fee, which had been set at $375.55 for the coming financial year.
AFCA chief ombudsman and chief executive, David Locke, said: “Members welcomed the fact the model rewards good complaints resolution performance, and that it apportions fees fairly based on use of AFCA’s services.
“The feedback we received was overwhelmingly positive. This is a fair, transparent and equitable funding model. Ultimately, firms have control over the fees they pay by taking a resolution mindset when managing complaints.”
The association’s consultation into the model included 60 meetings with peak bodies and members who were most likely to see an impact, five webinars for all members and 11,000 tailored impact assessments sent to firms.
Feedback from firms saw instalments introduced for member payments above a threshold amount, no fee would be payable for complaints found outside of AFCA’s jurisdiction and the five annual free complaints would be excluded when AFCA calculated the user charge for frequent users of the service. There would also be a single registration fee and simplified complaint fee structure.
The superannuation levy has been abolished and super funds have been brought under the same fee structure as other scheme members.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.