AFA calls on Govt for overhaul of FSRB

compliance financial services reform financial advisers FPA AFA federal government australian securities and investments commission

14 December 2000
| By Nicole Szollos |

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has hit out at the delay of the Financial Services Reform Bill (FSRB), saying the Federal Government should re-examine existing legislation.

Outgoing AFA president John Hibberd says the Agents and Brokers Act has worked well and should be considered during the impasse over FSRB.

"Our view is the Act worked well for three sides: product manufacturers, consumers and advisers. There is a system that works and we would like to see it expanded," Hibberd says.

Life agents have not been comfortable with several facets of FSRB and agree with a single regulatory body, but not all the changes under the new corporations law, Hibberd says.

The proposed model makes the regulatory policies for life agents increasingly complex, according to Hibberd, as life advisers will need to shift from agent contracts to proper authority contracts in order to continue distributing products.

At the same time, the moving of liability to the dealer and new compliance measures will increase the cost of business by one-third, Hibberd says.

Despite the setback, the Financial Planning Association (FPA) has remained bullish on the legislation, with public policy manager Con Hristodoulidis saying the association will continue to push for the FSRB.

The FPA has planned a meeting with the of Minister for Financial Services Joe Hockey and hopes to "gain an idea of what the Minister is thinking, then reorganise from there," Hristodoulidis says.

He adds that the FPA will also continue to support Interim Policy Statement (IPS) 146, as will the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC national director of financial services and regulation Ian Johnston says it is urging those in the securities and life industries to go ahead with IPS146.

"There is a different legislative hook for the other practitioners without FSRB in place, but we do see IPS146 as being able to be decoupled from the FSRB if need be."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 18 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 9 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago