AFA and FPA question details of FSC policy

AFA FSC government and regulation life insurance FPA fpa chief executive financial advisers financial services council association of financial advisers financial planning association chief executive

6 August 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and Financial Planning Association (FPA) have broadly welcomed the Financial Services Council's (FSC's) new policy on life insurance sales commission clawbacks but have questions over some of the details.

In particular, the AFA was concerned that the three-year responsibility period (during which an adviser would be liable to pay back part or all of the commission earned on life insurance products sold if the policy lapsed for any reason) was overly punitive towards advisers, given the range of client circumstances that could cause a policy to lapse.

Innovation and improvements to life insurance products could also lead to clients wanting to switch or upgrade policies and this would create important implications for advisers in terms of their best interests duty, the AFA stated.

The AFA suggested a hybrid remuneration model would be the most effective way to align the interests of consumers, advisers, licensees and product providers. "It encourages a long-term view and promotes improved persistency levels for all involved. It also encourages the delivery of a clear service proposition," the AFA stated.

Where a hybrid remuneration model was adopted, a one-year responsibility period would be appropriate, the AFA stated.

The life insurance industry also needs to make it easier to access its products though technological enhancements and automatic upgrades, the AFA stated.

FPA chief executive Mark Rantall also raised concerns over the three-year clawback period and said the FPA would seek clarification over how the clawbacks would apply to hybrid and level commission structures.

"Nobody supports churning but legitimate replacement policies should not be unduly restricted for either consumers or financial planners," he said.

Both the AFA and FPA said they welcomed the consultative approach taken by the FSC and looked forward to contributing to the working group to develop the policy.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 days ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS