Advisers told to charge what their advice is really worth

ASIC Rob Jones AIA Australia Peloton Partners fees advice

4 March 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Financial advisers should not be unilaterally cutting fees in a race to the bottom. They should instead be charging fees which accurately and profitably reflect the value and complexity of the advice they are providing.

At the same time as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is conducting its affordable advice review and as Government ministers have canvassed broader use of general and intra-fund advice, advisers have been told that too many of them are simply not charging enough to ensure they are sufficiently remunerated and profitable.

What is more, the advisers have been told that they should be regularly reviewing the adequacy of their fees in circumstances where some are doing so as infrequently as every five years.

Speaking during an AIA Australia adviser forum, Peloton Partners chief executive, Rob Jones said that there was a tendency by advisers to want to push costs down when dealing with hard-pressed clients, but that they needed to understand and explain the cost of the advice they were providing.

He said there was a need to properly cost the service, value and complexity of the advice that was being delivered.

Jones said that advisers needed to understand that clients were not being forced to obtain financial advice and were doing so on the basis of a “self-selection process triggered by specific events or needs including a lack of understanding of financial-related matters”.

“Therefore, they are electing to invest in their financial wellbeing, financial security and financial improvement,” he said.

Jones said there was both a cost and an investment inherent in the adviser/client relationship.

“We must understand the cost of delivering advice so we can attach a reasonable profit and for too long we have neglected profit,” he said.

“Clients can always find an adviser who will undercut another adviser – so focussing on cost only or trying to cut fees to make it work for a client is a ‘flight to the bottom’ and only the client will benefit,” Jones said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS