Advisers realising benefits of flat fees

advisers investment advice advice

31 August 2010
| By Caroline Munro |

Advisers are leaning more towards flat fees as they review their businesses and properly price their services, according to Elixir Consulting’s Sue Viskovic.

In the industry drive to fee-for-service, most businesses are moving down or considering the asset-based fees route, as opposed to a flat fee or fee per hour. However, Viskovic asserted that there were those who felt asset-based fees were the new type of commission, while others were looking more closely at flat fees as a better option for their businesses.

“If you look through the disadvantages of asset-based fees, the problem with them is that they still keep a direct link between the amount of money managed and the cost of advice,” Viskovic said.

She added that while the adviser would agree on a percentage payment with their clients, taking control back from the product provider, there was still the potential that the adviser would consolidate assets within the wrap platform that they chose to use because that was the only way they could administer the fee.

However, Viskovic felt that asset-based fees were still a valid method of charging for an advice model based around investment advice in addition to strategic advice.

Viskovic said with advisers now having the ability to charge a flat fee and quantify the advice, one of the newest payment models is charging a flat fee for advice and an asset-based fee if they manage funds as well.

“If we look at percentages across the board, most would go to asset-based fees because that’s the first, easiest step if you’re going from commissions,” she said. “But we are seeing more advisers really getting their heads around the flat fee option. In the past they may have thought that hypothetically a flat fee may have been the better way to go, and philosophically that would be the better outcome, but they just didn’t know how to come up with that number.”

Viskovic said when they really assess both options, a number of people realised that a flat fee made more sense for their business.

“As a business person, I would say that you’ve got to choose the right option for you.”

Viskovic said an asset-based fee model was only really appropriate for a business that adds real value to investment management.

“They really have good skills in that area and don’t just select a multi-manager approach, for example. Their skills, expertise and competence are worth paying for,” she added.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS