Advisers may need to be more active
It will get harder to see strong double digital or high single digit returns going forward forever and advisers need to be conscious that they may need to be more active to generate a good outcome, according to IOOF.
IOOF incoming chief investment officer, Dan Farmer, said while the market had been very strong for the past seven to eight years, advisers could not be complacent and except that those conditions were going to be the same for the next 10 years.
“Going forward, excess returns through active management and not necessarily being fully passive and getting the index market beta could be really important in clients’ overall outcomes,” Farmer said.
“It’s been a great period and that market is still pretty reasonable in the short-term at least but we certainly are getting fuller valuations, bond markets aren’t going to keep rallying a lot at this point, property prices are pretty full.”
Farmer noted that the strong market challenged advisers to express and demonstrate the long-term benefits of potentially paying a higher fee if they were to receive excess returns for that higher fee.
“Advisers really need to come back to the end question of ‘What is the client trying to achieve? What is the best way to get them to the outcome?’,” he said.
“From an investment perspective, it’s really on the return net of fees, so we think by spending some fees on active managers, good quality active managers, targeted use of the investment fee where active managers can generate excess return after fees, the net outcome of the clients is better even if they are paying a slightly higher fee.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
