Adviser Ratings under fire from FPA

FPA/financial-planners/fpa-chief-executive/fpa-members/financial-advisers/chief-executive/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

11 April 2002
| By Jason |

The FinancialPlanning Association (FPA) has forced the Adviser Ratings group into a back down over its plans to publish a ranking of financial planners.

In a letter to Adviser Ratings, the FPA threatened the group with legal action under the Trade Practice Act and the new privacy legislation if it did not radically alter its system for publishing the rating of advisers.

The Adviser Ratings group, which charges planners to be rated, had intended to publish a complete list of all known financial advisers in Australia, including those who had not agreed to be rated.

But the FPA was inundated with complaints from planners after Adviser Ratings contacted the planners saying they would be referred to in the ranking system as having “failed to achieve a rating” if they did not agree to be rated.

Financial planners contacted byMoneyManagementsaid the system would put planners who did not pay to be rated at a disadvantage and was clearly designed to force advisers to pay for the rating.

Money Managementis aware of a number of planning groups who were prepared to pursue legal action independent of the FPA over the controversy.

“[The system] was a grubby grab for subscribers by essentially attempting to blackmail financial planners into getting rated,” one adviser said.

Adviser Ratings chief executive David Childs confirmed toMoney Managementlast week that the group had decided to back down and not list unrated advisers as part of its rankings.

But Childs has hit out at the FPA’s threat of legal action, labelling it as misguided and overly aggressive.

“The FPA sent a rather terse letter to us alleging we’d breached the Trade Practice Act and heaven knows what else, even though we [hadn’t yet] published one adviser’s name. We’ve dealt with their protests but were surprised at their aggressive approach,” he says.

FPA chief executive Ken Breakspear last week refused to endorse Adviser Ratings’ ranking of financial planners.

“FPA members already satisfy our own, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and legal regulations regarding the quality of planners,” Breakspear says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo