Adviser bannings are trending up, says ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has told a Parliamentary Committee that there has been an upward trend in the banning of financial advisers.
The regulator has told the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services that over the last three years there have been 103 financial adviser bannings, with the deputy chairman, Peter Kell saying “the trend has been upwards”.
Outlining the adviser bannings, Kell said there had been 25 in 2014-15, 37 in 2015-16 and 41 in the year to date, 2016-17.
“Those were bannings and also leaving the industry as a result of enforceable undertakings or civil action,’ he said.
“It has been a busy area for us, and an important area for us, as we deal with those advisers who have been causing problems,” Kell said.
The ASIC deputy chairman then referenced an announcement in early June relating to a Westpac adviser.
“He was banned for five years and there was around $1.5 million in refunds provided, and there is a lot more in the pipeline,” Kell said.
He said the data indicated that ASIC had been very active in the financial adviser space and it remained a major area of focus for the regulator.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
