Advice should be split by legislation

FOFA financial planning financial advice chief executive

21 February 2014
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Financial planning should be clearly split into two camps - aligned and non-aligned - and demarcated by legislation to provide transparency for consumers and clarity around adviser income and entitlements. 

Connect Financial Service Brokers chief executive Paul Tynan said this division would enhance the current Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation and would follow moves within other parts of financial services. 

Tynan said that large industry funds, institutions and banks support aligned general advice and that it would not be difficult to make the separation in the area of personal advice. 

“Why don’t we have aligned legislation for non-independent advice and non-aligned legislation for independent advice (personal advice) and work together to ensure that the Australian advice profession is the world’s best - is it really that hard?” Tynan said. 

According to Tynan, aligned advice would be defined as where an adviser is in a salaried position and licensed by an institution, with restrictions on the ownership of clients and buyer of last resort (BOLR) terms in place. 

Non-aligned advice would be defined as where an adviser is a self-employed business owner without restriction on the ownership of clients, and is able to transfer them in the event they leave a licensee. 

Tynan said these distinctions were necessary to provide clarity for advisers who need to leave a licensee - or even the profession - and still be able to realise a financial outcome commensurate with the work they have done as a planner. 

He said that outgoing planners should not be penalised for using commission-based products in the past as “that was the only product that was available that satisfied the consumers’ needs at that time”. 

He also questioned the fairness of an employee working within a legal framework to accumulate capital but then facing the possibility of losing those earnings because of a change in the relevant legislation. 

His comments follow those he made in earlier this month where he stated the bulk of problems around FOFA were the result of “self interest groups lobbying intensely to ensure that the interests of their particular sector, company or association had priority”. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

1 month ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

1 month ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

1 month ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 3 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has released the percentage of candidates who passed its August financial advice exam with the volume dropping to the lowest since November 2022....

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS