Adverse economics scupper illegal MISs
Economic conditions and lower investment returns have had more impact in reducing the number of illegal managed investment schemes in Australia than have the actions of the regulators.
That appears to be the bottom line of answers by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to questions on notice from a Parliamentary Joint Committee.
ASIC had been asked to explain why the number of illegal schemes against which action had been taken had been reduced from 39 in one reporting period to zero, with ASIC commissioner, Greg Tanzer, suggesting that it more to do with the business cycle than other elements.
Another ASIC senior executive, Warren Day, acknowledged to the Parliamentary Committee that the number of illegal schemes had been dropping significantly for around three years and particularly since the global financial crisis.
"We think that is a business cycle thing, where we are coming into a much lower return environment, and we think that has driven a number of these schemes out of existence," he said.
Data provided to the committee by ASIC on illegal managed investment schemes showed that the problem peaked in 2006/07 when 479 instances of litigation were completed.
The ASIC data also showed that there had been 386 instances of litigation relating to illegal managed investment schemes in the previous financial year.
Recommended for you
Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand.
The third quarter of 2024 saw the first positive increase in adviser numbers for 12 months, according to the latest quarterly Musical Chairs report, with new entrants overwhelmingly choosing to join privately owned firms.
As more advisers review their fee structures, Business Health has shared six steps to calculating the price to deliver financial advice services in a profitable yet suitable way.
ASIC’s Sarah Court has confirmed the regulator is carrying out systematic work on providers of unlicensed advice but admits it is a case of “whack-a-mole” when it comes to disciplining them.
