Administrators slate defunct CitiStreet

australian market global financial crisis cooper review

14 January 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Australia’s three largest superannuation administrators have pointed to the now-defunct joint venture between State Street and Citigroup — CitiStreet — as an example of what can go wrong when margins are too narrow.

In a joint submission to the Cooper Review into superannuation, the three administrators used the demise of CitiStreet to underline their arguments with respect to pricing, and claimed that, with respect to long-term viability, there were lessons to be learnt specifically from the CitiStreet case study.

The submission described Citistreet as a joint venture between State Street and Citigroup operating in the Australian market from 2002 to 2008, with the aim being to “bring a powerful force in solutions for superannuation and member services”.

It said Citistreet entered the market with SunSuper as a cornerstone client and expanded to a number of other clients including Non-Government Schools and EquipSuper, but even though the administrator had the financial backing of two multinationals, experience and a solid client base it could not make a profit.

The submission said that according to its last financial accounts, lodged with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, for the year ending calendar 2007 CitiStreet had posted a net operating loss of $10.5 million.

“In 2008, partially due to the shake up in investment banking resulting from the global financial crisis, the international backers made the decision to exit the Australian market — leaving CitiStreet clients to find alternative arrangements,” it said.

“Citistreet was in effect absorbed by its major client SunSuper, with other clients moving to alternative administrators. Ultimately, no superannuation fund member administered by Citistreet lost their savings in this experience, but the risks and costs associated with the prompt exit will ultimately be borne by members and affect their long-term retirement benefit,” the submission said.

“The lesson here is that margins have been too low to provide a framework for sustainable long-term investment,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 5 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS