Active managers lose out

institutional-investors/

6 September 2000
| By Jason |

Active portfolio management does not add value while index funds offer a better option according to Vanguard group director and Princeton University Professor of Economics Burton Malkiel.

Active portfolio management does not add value while index funds offer a better option according to Vanguard group director and Princeton University Professor of Economics Burton Malkiel.

Malkiel says the chief reasons for active managers not adding appropriate value is that costs and market timing hamper their performance.

“Markets are efficient and react well to news and given that it is difficult to respond before anyone else to get a better position,” Malkiel says.

“At the same time active managers turn over a portfolio regularly which incurs costs and investors, particularly institutional investors, don’t always see that.”

He says management costs between the two styles of funds are also at odds with an index fund averaging around 10 basis points while an active fund averages around 150 basis points.

At the same time Malkiel says it is difficult to beat the market as they themselves make up the market. He points out that the Vanguard 500 Trust Fund, the largest managed fund in the US has outperformed over three quarter of active managers in the last ten years and over 80 per cent in the last five years.

“Investors may ask about the performance of active managers in the remaining percentages in both of those periods but the question should be how will people know who they are before they invest funds,” Malkiel says.

The threat of being caught in a stock bubble and suffering when the market turns is a concern. However Malkiel says the best way to avoid this is to diversify into other sectors and take an index approach there also.

“At present technology stocks are nearly one third of the US market and some see this as a bubble while others as part of a new industrial revolution. Valuations may prove true over time but for some stocks this may be a bubble,” Malkiel says.

“The paradox is that the index has yet to beat active managers and while the index is heavy is technology stocks, those managers are even more so, with the attendant results that come with a bubble bursting.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

5 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND