Accountants warn advisers against hourly rate
A sustainable revenue model needs to focus on more than simply charging an hourly rate, according to Brisbane accountancy firm elliots.
The managing partner of elliots, Matthew Schlyder, warned financial planners the hour-based revenue model used by accountants could result in unsatisfied clients and unproductive staff.
“Staff complete work according to target hours, instead of getting the work done as efficiently and as quickly as effectively possible,” Schlyder said.
“Accountants often work out how much to charge a client after they complete the work and invoice accordingly. Clients therefore have no idea what they are going to pay prior to the work being completed and value cannot be communicated,” he added.
However, he advised financial planners to consider charging by the hour only when managing capacity and costs and to align their pricing structure to the value they are providing the client.
“Most accountants are fearful of their client relationship around price, and because of this they don’t value their own skills, experience and intellectual property,” he said.
Schlyder said the fee-for-service remuneration model is now a reality that cannot be ignored and those who do not make the transition from commission based payments smoothly might face some difficulties.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
