ACCC decision has implications for financial planning


The competition regulator, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), has issued a decision regarding membership of industry organisations which may have implications for groups such as the Financial Planning Association and the Association of Financial Advisers.
The ACCC late last week decided to allow a continuation of a situation under which mortgage brokers working for particular lending businesses are required to be members of the Mortgage Finance Association of Australia (MFAA).
The regulator said it had decided to "allow the protection from legal action for the arrangements to continue".
Commenting on the regulator's decision, ACCC chairman Rod Sims said the ACCC believed the arrangements continued to deliver benefits to the public, notwithstanding the commencement of a national regulatory regime for the credit industry in 2010.
He pointed out that the MFAA's membership requirements imposed higher educational standards and certain other professional requirements on its members than the regulatory regime.
"The ACCC considers requiring MFAA membership is likely to assist those lending businesses to ensure that their brokers are of a consistently high standard and to meet their compliance obligations under the Act," Sims said.
The ACCC's formal statement said that while it acknowledged requiring MFAA membership restricted choice of professional association for the broker - thereby limiting competition from other similar professional associations - the small number of brokers involved meant any public detriment was minimal.
"Further, the MFAA membership requirement is only imposed by two industry participants," it said. "There are a large number of other businesses that individual brokers can work for if they disagree with the MFAA membership requirement."
The ACCC initiated a review of the arrangements last year after receiving a complaint alleging anti-competitive behaviour.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.