ACCC decision has implications for financial planning

ACCC financial planning financial planning association association of financial advisers financial advisers chairman

14 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The competition regulator, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), has issued a decision regarding membership of industry organisations which may have implications for groups such as the Financial Planning Association and the Association of Financial Advisers.

The ACCC late last week decided to allow a continuation of a situation under which mortgage brokers working for particular lending businesses are required to be members of the Mortgage Finance Association of Australia (MFAA).

The regulator said it had decided to "allow the protection from legal action for the arrangements to continue".

Commenting on the regulator's decision, ACCC chairman Rod Sims said the ACCC believed the arrangements continued to deliver benefits to the public, notwithstanding the commencement of a national regulatory regime for the credit industry in 2010.

He pointed out that the MFAA's membership requirements imposed higher educational standards and certain other professional requirements on its members than the regulatory regime.

"The ACCC considers requiring MFAA membership is likely to assist those lending businesses to ensure that their brokers are of a consistently high standard and to meet their compliance obligations under the Act," Sims said.

The ACCC's formal statement said that while it acknowledged requiring MFAA membership restricted choice of professional association for the broker - thereby limiting competition from other similar professional associations - the small number of brokers involved meant any public detriment was minimal.

"Further, the MFAA membership requirement is only imposed by two industry participants," it said. "There are a large number of other businesses that individual brokers can work for if they disagree with the MFAA membership requirement."

The ACCC initiated a review of the arrangements last year after receiving a complaint alleging anti-competitive behaviour.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 3 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 3 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS