70% of advisers suspicious of code
Fewer than 30% of advisers who responded to a Money Management survey believe they can adhere to the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) code of ethics as it currently stands.
The survey, completed by more than 150 respondents, revealed that only 26.24% believed that they both understood and could adhere to the code of ethics, with many suggesting that in its current form it placed them at considerable risk.
Asked to explain their negativity about the code, many respondents expressed the view that it had be weighted against their interests.
Typical of the responses was one which stated: “Nobody can adhere to the code. It is deliberately and malevolently designed to be impossible to comply with so that no adviser will stand any chance in the face of any complaint”.
The same respondent said: “You will always at least fail standard 3 because you will always have greater than 0% conflict and the standard is all encompassing. Advisers will be nothing but fodder for consumers, regulators and lawyers”.
Another stated: “Too much ambiguity around the standards. Too much room for FASEA, ASIC and others to apply their own judgement”.
A further respondent wrote: “The code bans 80% of my income and I have haven't been given enough notice to change my business model. What is FASEA thinking?”
Recommended for you
Betashares has named the top Australian suburbs with the highest spare cash flow, shining a light on where financial advisers could eye out potential clients.
A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 for a client.
Estimates for the calendar year 2024 put the advice industry on track for a loss in adviser numbers as exits offset gains from new entrants.
Adviser Ratings shares five ways that financial advice changed in 2024 with an optimistic outlook for 2025, thanks to the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation.
