25% of degree-qualified advisers are falling short
As many as a quarter of degree-qualified financial planners are facing the cost of further education because their qualifications are not recognised under the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime.
That is one of the key findings of Money Management’s survey of adviser intentions in the wake of the FASEA regime, with respondents signalling their deep concern that the FASEA has not gone far enough in appropriately recognising older degrees, even when those degree have been supplemented by other qualifications.
The survey revealed that around six per cent of respondents held “non-relevant” degrees while a further 18 per cent held “non-relevant” degrees as well as diplomas of financial planning and other similar qualifications.
A number of respondents have expressed suspicion that the failure to recognise older degrees is owed to the number of academics sitting on the FASEA board, alleging that their education institutions will emerge as major financial beneficiaries form the new regime.
Some respondents said that the time they would need to dedicate to pursuing the necessary study and bridging courses was such that they would be culling lower-value clients, even though those clients would still need advice.
The Money Management survey has confirmed that as many as 30 per cent of advisers are likely to exit the industry because of the FASEA regime, but some advisers have suggested this figure may grow if the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry brings an end to grandfathered commissions.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
