150,000 people hit in ING unit price bungles
An estimated 150,000 of ING Australia’s clients are to be reimbursed an average of just under $100 each after the discovery of unit pricing errors in their life insurance policies and managed fund investments.
Stephen Sinclair, a spokesman for ING Australia, which is a joint venture between ING Group and ANZ Bank, said that most of the errors — 120,000 of them — were related to “tax provision reconciliation issues”.
“That’s why there was so many of them. If an error relates to a tax provision, we compensate just about everyone in an affected fund at a particular point in time.
“Essentially, these transactions should have been done, in some cases, in a more timely manner.”
ING said the other 30,000 cases were related to financial reconciliation errors, which can be caused by data variations and time variations between data feeds.
ING said the total bill for the errors came to $24.5 million.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has already accepted an enforceable undertaking from ING, which first mentioned the existence of the problem to it in 2003.
ASIC and ING both said the emergence of unit pricing errors was related to the merger between ANZ Orchard Investments and ING in 2002.
“The joint venture required the complex integration of entities and numerous products and systems,” ASIC said in a statement released last week.
Sinclair said: “Yes, the problems emerged during [the merger] period. Certain things were identified and investigated. It was clear that these things could have affected investors. We notified the regulators and we set up a dedicated project team. We’ve now improved our processes to make sure we have very tight controls going forward.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
