Resistance to restricted licensing for accountants

retirement savings government and regulation taxation accountants accountant assistant treasurer

18 October 2011
| By Benjamin Levy |
image
image
expand image

The Small Independent Super Funds Association (SISFA) has called on the government to refrain from implementing a restricted licensing framework for accountants, labelling it problematic.

SISFA used a submission on retirement and savings policy to the assistant treasurer to suggest that the government replace the removal of the accountants' exemption on SMSFs with a more definitive framework allowing accountants to provide services and advice to fulfil "necessary obligations", and to develop specialist knowledge and competency requirements to provide that advice.

However, SISFA stopped short of supporting government plans to create a restricted licensing regime for accountants.

"SISFA would be concerned and regard as problematic any licensing or limited licensing regime," the submission stated.

An accountant advising an SMSF client on a broad range of financial issues was no different to an accountant giving the same advice to a client within a company or trust, SISFA said.

SISFA also called on the government to implement a rolling concessional contribution cap to allow investors to make more contributions if their previous year's contribution was less than the cap limit. 

The current regulations around contributions were too rigid to provide a long term consideration of retirement savings, the submission said.

SISFA also suggested the alternative of a life time cap of concessional and non-concessional contributions to allow investors to increase contributions when they were capable, or a single universal limit for life-time super contributions regardless of age. 

The $500,000 threshold test for the $50,000 concessional contributions cap should be removed for that to happen, SISFA said.

SISFA slammed the current limits as almost penalising investors who didn't start saving early or saved inconsistently. 

They were rigid, discouraged saving through severe taxes, didn't allow for significant events affecting the adequacy of retirement savings, and militated against those who bore the cost of raising a family, the submission stated.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

4 days 15 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS