Lawyers and accountants escape licensing regime

financial planners commissions disclosure financial services reform accountants investment advice FPA

16 August 2000
| By Julie Bennett |

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

The same recommendations will also exclude life advisers from having to disclose commissions on risk products.

In a parliamentary report on the Financial Services Reform Bill handed down earlier this week, the Committee recommends the expansion of the ‘declared professional bodies’ exemption, which means lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the financial planning licensing regime.

The Committee has also accepted the life industry’s argument that commission disclosure puts risk advisers at a competitive disadvantage. Consequently, life advisers will not be required to disclose commissions on risk products.

However the FPA has opposed this stance with Public Policy Manager, Con Hristodoulidis arguing that anyone who offers financial services advice should be subject to the same rules and regulations as the rest of the profession.

“The Committee’s argument that the investment advice given by accountants and lawyers is ‘incidental’ is a fallacy,” he says.

“Such advice is not considered ‘incidental’ by consumers who use it as a basis for significant financial decisions. Feedback from our members indicates that a significant number of consumers have lost money because of so-called ‘incidental’ advice.”

Hristodoulidis further argues that consumer protection will be undermined if life advisers are exempted from disclosure obligations.

“The Committee’s acceptance of the argument that such disclosure requirements would act as a competitive disadvantage for life agents is an insult to consumers,” he says. “Consumers have a right to know where undisclosed incentives are biasing the advice.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS