Lawyers and accountants escape licensing regime

financial planners commissions disclosure financial services reform accountants investment advice FPA

16 August 2000
| By Julie Bennett |

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

The same recommendations will also exclude life advisers from having to disclose commissions on risk products.

In a parliamentary report on the Financial Services Reform Bill handed down earlier this week, the Committee recommends the expansion of the ‘declared professional bodies’ exemption, which means lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the financial planning licensing regime.

The Committee has also accepted the life industry’s argument that commission disclosure puts risk advisers at a competitive disadvantage. Consequently, life advisers will not be required to disclose commissions on risk products.

However the FPA has opposed this stance with Public Policy Manager, Con Hristodoulidis arguing that anyone who offers financial services advice should be subject to the same rules and regulations as the rest of the profession.

“The Committee’s argument that the investment advice given by accountants and lawyers is ‘incidental’ is a fallacy,” he says.

“Such advice is not considered ‘incidental’ by consumers who use it as a basis for significant financial decisions. Feedback from our members indicates that a significant number of consumers have lost money because of so-called ‘incidental’ advice.”

Hristodoulidis further argues that consumer protection will be undermined if life advisers are exempted from disclosure obligations.

“The Committee’s acceptance of the argument that such disclosure requirements would act as a competitive disadvantage for life agents is an insult to consumers,” he says. “Consumers have a right to know where undisclosed incentives are biasing the advice.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 15 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 6 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago