Lawyers and accountants escape licensing regime

financial planners commissions disclosure financial services reform accountants investment advice FPA

16 August 2000
| By Julie Bennett |

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

Lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the same licensing requirements as financial planners if the findings of the Joint Statutory Committee on Corporations and Securities are accepted.

The same recommendations will also exclude life advisers from having to disclose commissions on risk products.

In a parliamentary report on the Financial Services Reform Bill handed down earlier this week, the Committee recommends the expansion of the ‘declared professional bodies’ exemption, which means lawyers and accountants will not be subject to the financial planning licensing regime.

The Committee has also accepted the life industry’s argument that commission disclosure puts risk advisers at a competitive disadvantage. Consequently, life advisers will not be required to disclose commissions on risk products.

However the FPA has opposed this stance with Public Policy Manager, Con Hristodoulidis arguing that anyone who offers financial services advice should be subject to the same rules and regulations as the rest of the profession.

“The Committee’s argument that the investment advice given by accountants and lawyers is ‘incidental’ is a fallacy,” he says.

“Such advice is not considered ‘incidental’ by consumers who use it as a basis for significant financial decisions. Feedback from our members indicates that a significant number of consumers have lost money because of so-called ‘incidental’ advice.”

Hristodoulidis further argues that consumer protection will be undermined if life advisers are exempted from disclosure obligations.

“The Committee’s acceptance of the argument that such disclosure requirements would act as a competitive disadvantage for life agents is an insult to consumers,” he says. “Consumers have a right to know where undisclosed incentives are biasing the advice.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 days 19 hours ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 week 2 days ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 1 week ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The corporate regulator has named its new chief executive, who is set to replace retiring interim CEO Greg Yanco in March....

3 weeks 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS