Accounting bodies negative on TASA outcome

financial planners government FPA financial advice financial planning financial planning association accounting FOFA financial planning industry association of financial advisers AFA

7 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The major accounting organisations, CPA Australia and the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICAA), have lamented the Government's concessions to the financial planning industry in which it extended the implementation of key elements of the Tax Agents Services Act bill.

Having sought to urge the Government not to provide the concessions, CPA and the ICAA claimed the decision to effectively extend the implementation period by sending parts of the legislation off to a committee would be undermining consumer protections.

The two organisations issued a joint statement saying that the House of Representatives had chosen, at this stage, not to proceed with a law which would have provided vital consumer protections.

CPA Australia head of policy Paul Drum said the amendments were "designed to put in place appropriate protections — that don't currently exist — for consumers obtaining tax advice from financial planners".

"Consumers deserve to have access to the highest standards of professional advice from financial planners, which is what this new regulatory framework is aimed at delivering. Parliament's decision means that there will continue to be shortcomings in the standards that apply to the provision of tax advice from financial planners," he said.

His sentiments were echoed by ICAA general manager of leadership and quality, Yasser El-Ansary, who added that there had been three years for everyone to prepare for the reforms, plus three years of transition to the new framework.

"We will now work through another round of consultation, and work with Parliament and its processes to ensure the regulatory framework is passed in the remaining sitting weeks before the election," El-Ansary said.

However both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) said the decision taken in the Parliament had been appropriate and necessary.

The FPA's manager for policy and conduct, Dante De Gori, said the FPA was concerned that the need to pass legislation was prioritised over the need to follow due process, consult and develop legislation that would actually work.

"Financial Planners are licensed and regulated by ASIC to provide personal financial advice, which includes tax advice within the context of financial advice," he said. "Scare mongering by accounting bodies on this issue has been misleading and unhelpful.

"The fact is that the FOFA [Future of Financial Advice] regime starting on 1 July 2013 implements some of the greatest reforms to the financial advice profession ever seen, in particular the best interest duty. So we are disappointed that the government initially succumbed to this unsubstantiated scare mongering on related issues."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 days 15 hours ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 week 1 day ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 1 week ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks 4 days ago

The corporate regulator has named its new chief executive, who is set to replace retiring interim CEO Greg Yanco in March....

3 weeks 1 day ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS