Accountants bear brunt of limited licence

accountants the fold legal limited licence

20 November 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The unnecessarily arduous application process for limited licensees have meant limited licensees have been at a disadvantage compared to full licensees, a law firm said.

The Fold Legal wrote in a blog that ever since the accountants’ limited licence regime was introduced, accountants had lost the ability to appoint responsible managers who do not have three years’ regulated experience due to a policy change by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for financial services relating to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

Solicitor director, Jaime Lumsden Kelly, said this was at odds with ASIC policy for full licensees who could appoint responsible managers using a broad range of experience, such as those who are competent in general insurance because of unregulated reinsurance experience.

“The inconsistency has created a huge issue for licensed accountants with RMs who wish to retire, or have fallen ill unexpectedly,” she wrote.

“If an accountant needs to change their RM before the third anniversary of their licence, they will need to contract someone to fill that role, because no new RMs will now meet ASIC’s competency requirements for SMSFs prior to that date.”

ASIC’s decision to change the “tax advice exemption” for licensees has also had an impact on licensed accountants and their employees,” Lumsden Kelly said.

Previously any person could provide tax advice without holding an Australian financial services licence (AFSL) even if it was also a financial product advice because the exemption meant tax advice was treated as if it was not a financial service at all.

“While ASIC correctly identified that a licensee would not be able to comply with this exemption, because they could not make a statement that they were “not licensed”, in attempting to solve that problem, new problems were created,” Lumsden Kelly said.

“ASIC could have simply solved this conundrum by modifying the disclosure – ‘this advice is not subject to financial services regulatory protection’ would have been sufficient.”

Accountants operating under the limited licence regime would be most affected because it had created significant inconsistencies in the treatment of tax advice between licensed and unlicensed accountants.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 5 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 9 hours ago