Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Long-term oversight on SMSF advice says ASIC

SMSF/ASIC/smsf-trustees/peter-kell/SMSFs/accountants/

18 April 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) has said that self-managed super fund (SMSF) advice may fail to consider an investor's long-term retirement planning objectives. 

  ASIC commissioner Peter Kell said it was cracking down on SMSF advice because of the significance of the market and the added personality responsibility SMSFs had over their investments

  "ASIC therefore wants to make sure those investors can be confident they can obtain good quality advice through gatekeepers such as accountants and financial planners," Kell said. 

  ASIC's SMSF Taskforce reviewed 100 investor files relating to the establishment of an SMSF on the advice of a planner or accountant, focusing on higher risk categories. 

  Although most advice provided was adequate, pockets of poor advice did exist, it said, including inadequate consideration of an investor's long-term retirement planning objectives. 

  Advice was not sufficiently tailored to the needs of the investor and there was inadequate consideration of an investor's long-term retirement goals, ASIC said. 

  It also found that replacement product disclosure and insurance recommendations were absent or inadequate. 

  Kell said ASIC had found that an inappropriate single asset class was provided to investors while suitable alternatives were not considered.  

The review represents ASIC's SMSF Taskforce's first major project in its crackdown on the SMSF space. 

  "ASIC does not want to see an influx of trustees who are ill-equipped to cope with the responsibilities and obligations of running an SMSF, and SMSF investors receive good quality advice and services from gatekeepers," it said. 

  Kell said ASIC was particularly concerned with aggressive marketing tactics of some advertisements in pushing property purchases through SMSFs.

AMP SMSF head of policy and technical, Peter Burgess said the 28 per cent of advice considered inadequate highlighted the need for SMSF trustees to seek an advisers with specialist SMSF skills and training.

He said advice was just one piece of the SMSF journey with adequate administration also necessary.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND