Index investing supports vibrant capital markets

index investing expert analysis

23 April 2018
| By Industry |
image
image
expand image

Index investing has profoundly changed the way investors seek returns, manage risk, and build portfolios.

For nearly 50 years, index investment vehicles have lowered costs and simplified access to diversified investments for all investors, from sophisticated institutions to individuals.

Choice now extends beyond traditional equity indexes, which include stocks in proportion to their market-capitalisation, to a whole array of more dynamic indexes compiled according to other methodologies.

While the benefits of index investing to investors are widely recognised, concerns focus on the role of index investing with respect to efficient capital markets – specifically, that index investing may harm the functioning of equity markets.

However, many of the underlying arguments either are not supported in the data or would benefit from greater clarity and a common language around key concepts.

We see two themes emerging:

First, some commentators have sought to examine the role that index investing plays in capital markets. In particular, they ask whether index funds – index mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) – have the potential to distort investment flows, create stock price bubbles, or conversely, exacerbate a decline in market prices.

Second, other commentators have explored index investing, stock ownership, and competition, attributing higher consumer prices, escalating executive compensation, and even aspects of wealth inequality to index investment products.

Does index investing distort investment flows into sectors or asset classes?

This theory is based on a concern that index funds drive flows in a potentially disruptive way.

However, it is the asset allocation decisions made by asset owners that drive flows into different asset classes, sectors, and geographies, not the investment vehicles or products.

Drivers of asset allocation decisions include macroeconomic developments such as global interest rate policy.

In addition, index investing overall represents less than 20 per cent of global equities. Index funds and ETFs together represent just over 12 per cent of the US equity universe, and seven per cent of the global equity universe.

THEORIES

MARKET REALITIES

Flows into index investment are driving up valuations in the stock market, and could create pricing bubbles, or exacerbate downward movements in stocks when sentiment changes.

It is asset allocation decisions that drive flows into different asset classes, sectors and geographies –not investment styles or products. Index investing is just one way to implement these decisions.

If investors favour a particular region or sector they can invest via single stocks, ETFs, managed funds, and derivatives.

 

In addition, the index universe is extremely diverse across products, vehicles, and providers.

  • Index assets are dispersed widely throughout the investable universe.

 

Index fads drive flows into particular super stocks, inflating prices.

As above, asset allocations – not products or vehicles – drive flows into different sectors.

  • Moreover, indexes are not static –their constituents are adjusted periodically (e.g., quarterly, semi-annually). Index weights, additions, and deletions change over time.

Does index investing hinder price discovery?

This theory asks whether index investing hinders the mechanism by which investors interpret information to determine (or ‘discover’) the price of a stock.

In practice, the efficiency of capital markets has benefitted from leaps in technology. A variety of information sources and market participants contribute to price discovery, and active trading still dominates the process.

THEORIES

MARKET REALITIES

Index investors cause stock prices to deviate from their correct valuations, by investing on ‘auto-pilot’ – making markets inefficient

Active stock trading still dominates the price discovery process.

  • Active strategies have larger assets under management (AUM), as well as higher stock turnover ratios. In US equity markets, an estimated $22 is traded by active stock selectors for every $1 traded by index-funds.

 

For the price of a stock to deviate from its correct valuation for longer than one trading day, flows and new investments by index funds would need to cause permanent effects on prices.

  • Short-term price changes create opportunity for active managers, and are quickly traded away.

 

Any future impact on price discovery by index investing is ultimately self-regulating – resulting in an equilibrium between active and index.

  • If index investing were to grow large enough to affect price discovery, any short-term price fluctuations on individual stocks would be used by active managers to improve their performance. This would attract flows back into active, and create continuous adjustment to an equilibrium between index and active.

 

Index funds are free-riders on the hard work of active managers in determining stock prices, without contributing to efficient markets.

The trading of ETFs on stock exchanges is an important contributor to price discovery across markets sectors, and individual stocks.

  • International ETFs traded during US market hours contribute to price discovery every day when non-US markets are closed.
  • During suspensions of international stocks or markets, ETFs, for example, may be the primary source of pricing information available to market participants.

 

Index investing is increasing correlation among stock prices, diminishing the ability of active managers to generate returns through stock selection.

Correlations in returns are driven by factors related to the macro environment –including interest rate levels –not index investing.

  • Stock correlations were higher in the 1930s, prior to the development of index investing.
  • Correlations among currencies – a market with little index investing – have also risen in the past decade, reflecting interest rate policy and the macroeconomic environment.
  • When common factors (such as global interest rate policy, changes in aggregate demand, or the prices of raw materials) explain a large fraction of return movements relative to stock-specific return, correlations will be larger, and the opportunities for active managers will be fewer.

 

The growing market share of index strategies may present opportunities for active managers should we ever get to the stage where index flows affect prices.

  • This eventuality seems far off in the future and is naturally self-correcting. As mentioned above, any impact on price discovery would enable active managers to take advantage of short term price fluctuations to improve their performance, and attract flows back into active management.

Index investing and price discovery in context 

Figure 1 shows the relative size of trading of futures, stocks, and ETFs.

Futures trading volumes far exceed either the secondary market trading in ETFs or the creation and redemptions of ETF shares. Their contribution to price discovery at the sector level is widely acknowledged.

However, while trading in the futures market is largely concentrated in two US indexes – the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 – ETFs trade more broadly, contributing to price discovery across sectors, countries and asset classes.

Index investing provides a number of important benefits. First, given the diversity of indexes and the breadth of their holdings, index funds provide capital to a very large number of companies across the spectrum of size, geography, and sector. 

Second, index investors take a long-term perspective on the companies that they hold. In an era where long-termism is a scarcity, these funds provide stability. 

Third, sponsors of large index funds are actively engaged in investment stewardship. The scale of these funds allows firms to invest more resources in this area.

As a result, most large index funds vote their proxies, rather than outsourcing this function to a proxy advisory firm. 

Finally, index funds democratise access to diversified investment portfolios. Institutional investors have established diversified portfolios at a low cost for decades.

Index funds allow individual investors to enjoy these same benefits. 

Alex Zaika is director of iShares Australia.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 days 2 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

6 days 6 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

5 days 9 hours ago