Why fund managers are facing a crisis of confidence

global financial crisis fund managers financial services industry financial planners australian financial services investment trends van eyk research morningstar

10 September 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

It is now clear that the failure of many fund managers to appropriately navigate the global financial crisis has caused many investors to question the ultimate value they generate.

Managed funds have represented a focal point of the Australian financial services industry over the past two decades but it is now clear that the failure of many fund managers to appropriately navigate the global financial crisis has caused many investors to question the ultimate value they generate.

Research undertaken by Investment Trends has served to underline the degree to which the global financial crisis and the relative underperformance of many managed funds has prompted investors to look at both direct investment and active share trading.

It appears active managers have been particularly negatively perceived in circumstances where, when the chips were down, they were not seen to have delivered on their promise of outperformance.

This, in turn, has served to reignite the longest running of all investment debates — active versus passive.

When this debate, the findings of the Investment Trends research and the advent of a fee-for-service for financial planners is taken into account, it becomes inevitable that fund managers must confront their own reality with respect to fees and alter their models accordingly.

Coupled with any re-examination of fees by funds managers must also be the recent analysis by leading financial services specialist lawyer, Noel Davis that there exists scope for investors to litigate in circumstances where the fees charged by funds managers do not appropriately reflect the returns they generate.

All of this is as it should be. Financial planners have had to alter their remuneration models in the move away from commissions, dealer groups are currently having to review their models, including volume rebate arrangements, and it follows that the product manufacturers should also be looking at the way they do business.

Also being questioned are the commercial models being utilised by research houses, with the principal of van Eyk Research, Mark Thomas, critical of the model utilised by competitors such as Lonsec, Zenith and Morningstar. It will have escaped no one’s attention that van Eyk’s research mandate with a major dealer group, Count Financial, is currently under review.

While a good deal of uncertainty last week remained with respect to which of the major parties would ultimately form Government in Australia, the financial services industry is well aware that a bi-partisan approach exists to the need to separate advice from product sales.

It seems while financial planners have been the first to be affected, changes will ultimately occur all along the financial services food chain.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 month 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 months 2 weeks ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

6 days 18 hours ago

Lonsec has appointed a new chief executive for its research and ratings division as Mike Wright takes up a new role in light of the acquisition of Evidentia Group by Lons...

1 month ago

The Financial Services and Credit Panel has cancelled the registration of an NSW adviser for two years as it felt he displayed a ‘level of incompetence’ in providing advi...

1 month ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS