Uncertainty is the only certainty
The Rudd Government’s second Budget could have been much tougher than it ultimately proved to be. In what has become a tradition, the Government ensured that all the bad news was leaked ahead of time, leaving some good news to be announced on Budget night.
But if the Government believes its tinkering with the superannuation system will ultimately be well received by either voters or the financial services community, it will be sadly mistaken.
The tinkering with superannuation contained in the Budget may, as is being claimed, serve to push around $4 billion back into Government coffers, but it has also done something else — created further uncertainty about superannuation as an investment option.
While superannuation has grown to be the most popular investment option in Australia and, indeed, a factor that has underpinned this nation’s ability to withstand the worst of the global financial crisis, this has not been fully reflected in public confidence.
Years of tinkering by governments and a tendency by politicians to regard superannuation as something of a revenue milch cow has served to make Australians cautious about superannuation and the rules that govern the regime.
It had been hoped that after the Howard Government’s ‘Better Super’ initiatives and the seeming bi-partisan support for making superannuation a focal point of Australia’s retirement incomes policy, the days of super tinkering might be over. Sadly, the 2009-10 Federal Budget suggests this is simply not the case.
In the greater scheme of things, the changes announced in the Budget are not unduly significant and ought to be understandable in the context of a Government battling to deal with a deep recession and burgeoning deficit. As well, there is the Government undertaking that some of the changes are temporary.
However, the net result of the Budget has been to remind Australians that superannuation remains an uncertain environment and that those aged in their 50s ought not plan too far ahead lest they are burned by policy changes.
It is in these circumstances that the Government owes it to the electorate and the superannuation industry to use the final report of the Henry Review of taxation to create some genuine certainty on superannuation. The time for fiddling has passed.
— Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew is joined by Andrew Lockhart, managing partner at Metrics Credit Partners, to discuss the attraction of real estate debt and why it can be a compelling option for portfolio diversification.
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Unplugged, AMP’s chief economist, Shane Oliver, joins us to break down Labor’s budget, focusing on its re-election strategy and cost-of-living support, and cautioning about the long-term impact of structural deficits, increased government spending, and potential risks to productivity growth.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Mark Barnes, head of investment research, and Catherine Yoshimoto, director of product management, from FTSE Russell about markets in Donald Trump's second presidency and how US small caps are faring compared to their large-caps counterpart.
In this episode of Relative Return Unplugged, we examine the push for superannuation tax reforms aimed at saving $10 billion annually, as well as the immense pressure being placed on Treasurer Jim Chalmers ahead of the budget and Deloitte’s warning of a $26.1 billion deficit.
