Trustee licensing on CMSF agenda

australian prudential regulation authority trustee superannuation industry investments commission australian securities and investments commission risk management

1 May 2006
| By Mike Taylor |

For the first time in a number of years the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) does not boast heavy representation by either of the major financial services regulators — the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

While officials from the regulators have been involved in multiple sessions in previous years, the picture is very different in 2006, with fund executives discussing the implications of regulatory changes rather than relying on the interpretations of the regulators themselves.

About as close as the regulators come to the key issues is a session to be addressed by the deputy chairman of APRA, Ross Jones, titled “Licensing — A Post War Reconstruction”.

Within that session, Jones is expected to examine the issues surrounding 500 funds being reduced to 350 within two years and, most importantly, transition arrangements.

Despite the fact that trustee licensing has become the single largest issue confronting the superannuation industry, those attending the CMSF will only see it broadly discussed in a limited number of forums.

The first such occasion will be on day one, when the conference will deal with “Licensing — how to keep your licence — what to audit” — during which partners with PricewaterhouseCoopers Claire Keating and David Coogan will discuss how, under APRA licensing, there is a requirement for an external auditor to provide an opinion on whether the trustee and fund have complied with their Risk Management Statement and Risk Management Plan.

The workshop will focus on what evidence is required for both trustees and their external auditor to provide an unqualified opinion in the first year of APRA licensing.

The forum agenda notes that, given the role of the external auditor has been substantially expanded under APRA licensing, and given the nature of the audit assurance is a lot different in scope, it is important that trustees understand the scope of these new audit requirements.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 days 22 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 weeks 5 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS