Testing time for in-house training

australian financial services financial planning industry financial planners recruitment

24 September 2008
| By By Mike Taylor |

Australian financial services firms are fast coming to terms with the reality that the current market volatility is going to be with the Australian financial services indus­try well into 2009 and that there is a need for them to adjust their strategies accordingly.

The overriding impera­tive is, without doubt, to minimise expenditures without at the same time undermining service levels and therefore revenue-gen­eration opportunities.

Unfortunately, when confronted by such a test­ing equation, there is a tendency on the part of executives to look too much at short-term objectives without exam­ining the long-term ram­ifications. This certainly seems to be the case where some recent employment and training strategies are concerned.

The bottom line appears to be that, in pur­suit of reducing costs, some companies have opted to abandon the in-house training of financial planners in favour of recruiting those deemed fully-trained.

At first blush such strategies appear sensible, particularly where there is an expectation that much of the work that was being carried out by trainees and paraplanners can be achieved by advis­ers themselves with no diminution in service lev­els and turnover.

However, what firms need to ask themselves is whether what they are really doing is outsourcing their training obligations to those firms still pre­pared to recruit people and train them to become paraplanners, planners and, ultimately, certified financial planners.

The financial planning industry would not be the first sector in which firms had fallen into the trap of discarding some elements of in-house training in the interests of achieving cost reductions, but those making the decisions need to fully understand the medium and long-term consequences and, in particular, the likeli­hood of specific skills shortages.

While it may be true that the current market downturn has taken some of the edge off demand for financial planners, it is only a few short months since dealer groups and individual financial planning prac­tices were prepared to pay top dollar for experienced planners with good client lists. Indeed, many prac­tices still are prepared to pay top dollar.

If the financial planning industry does not want to find itself confronted by an even tighter labour market in the back-end of 2009 and early 2010, then it will not lightly abandon what have arguably been some of its most effective training and recruitment regimes.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 19 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 23 hours ago