Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Tax cuts still needed

federal-government/cent/superannuation-guarantee/taxation/superannuation-industry/superannuation-funds/association-of-superannuation-funds/

22 February 2006
| By Mike Taylor |

The Federal Government has a lot more work to do on superannuation policy if it is to win the plaudits of the superannuation industry, according to the latest IUS/Super Review Super Outlook survey.

While the survey found most respondents believed the Government’s policy changes had made at least some improvement, it also made clear that further work was needed, particularly with respect to reforming the taxation regime as it impacts the industry.

Surprisingly, the industry was less than convinced about the need to increase the superannuation guarantee to 15 per cent, despite the measure remaining at the forefront of both union and industry fund agendas.

While the Federal Government has signalled it has gone about as far as it is prepared to go with respect to reworking the superannuation tax regime, the industry is sending a very different signal, with close to 100 per cent of respondents making it clear that a reduction in tax scales should be a priority.

Asked to nominate the importance of policy issues that might be under consideration by the Federal Government, reducing tax emerged as the priority, with 87.2 per cent of respondents saying it was of either large or major importance, while a further 12.8 per cent said it was of moderate importance.

The second priority issue for the Government to consider was extending the superannuation co-contribution regime, with 94.9 per cent of respondents saying it was of moderate to major importance, while providing greater incentives to savings was regarded as almost equally important.

Increasing the superannuation guarantee to 15 per cent was regarded as being of large or major importance by 52.8 per cent of respondents, with 33.3 per cent saying it was of moderate importance and 8.3 per cent saying such a measure was of small importance. Just 5.6 per cent of respondents said it was of no importance.

The findings of the IUS/Super Review survey coincide with the central thrust of the pre-Budget submission filed with Treasury by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia in December, which called for a reduction in the superannuation tax regime and an extension of the co-contribution regime.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND