Merging the FPA and AFA no easy task

financial-planning/financial-planning-industry/financial-planning-association/AFA/commissions/remuneration/FPA/financial-advisers/association-of-financial-advisers/chief-executive/

22 March 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

If the Financial Planning Association and the Association of Financial Advisers are to merge they will have to work through many divisive issues.

Are the various interest groups that make up the Australian financial planning industry capable of finding enough common ground to form a single, overarching industry organisation?

That, in essence, was the question posed last week by dealer group Matrix when it canvassed a merger of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

Interestingly, neither the FPA nor the AFA are dismissing the concept out of hand, yet it is a concept that will give the soon-to-depart chief executive of the FPA, Jo-Anne Bloch, cause for a wry smile given the clear-cut differences in policy that have emerged between the two organisations.

After all, it was the FPA’s timetable for moving away from commissions-based remuneration that last year generated a minor membership migration to an AFA that seemed to quite deliberately and publicly eschew such a concept.

In short, the policy, philosophical and cultural differences between the FPA and the AFA have always seemed to run deep — something ultimately exemplified by the underlying make-up of their memberships.

While there has been much common ground found between the two organisations, the success and membership growth enjoyed by the AFA has owed a great deal to its ability to differentiate itself from the larger FPA.

Notwithstanding these obvious hurdles, the Matrix proposal makes good sense for an industry that boasts less than 20,000 participants but already has two major organisations — the FPA and the AFA — seeking to represent its interests alongside other, more sectional groups.

In terms of giving the financial planning industry a single, more focused voice, a great deal stands to be achieved by merging the AFA and the FPA, but such an outcome can only be achieved if the vested interests on both sides work through the issues.

Merging Westpac with St George took nearly two years to achieve on the back of mutually agreed commercial and financial objectives. Successfully merging the AFA and the FPA may take a good deal longer and will require many people to put their egos and agendas on hold.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo