Mergers and acquisitions: unexpectedly branded

financial services industry australian financial services insurance axa asia pacific wealth management financial planners ACCC westpac

23 November 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

In the space of just 18 months, the Australian financial services industry has been subjected to one of its most significant periods of consolidation, yet the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has remained impassive.

Westpac has taken St George, IOOF and Australian Wealth Management have merged and then taken Skandia, NAB/MLC has taken Aviva Australia and, now, AMP has emerged with a bid for AXA Asia Pacific.

While some might argue this activity has not significantly altered the competitive dynamic of the nation’s financial services industry, it has certainly reduced the diversity of the underlying options available to financial planners.

Moreover, it is arguable that the mergers and acquisitions have reduced the sourcing of the products they might ultimately recommend to clients.

What needs to be closely examined by the ACCC is not so much the overarching ownership of particular companies, but how this filters down into the operations of their various market segments, subsidiaries and sub-brands.

A combined AMP/AXA Asia Pacific will represent a substantial force in the Australian financial services industry, particularly where wealth management and insurance is concerned. Indeed, such a combined entity might arguably act as a counterbalance to the likes of Westpac/St George and NAB/MLC/Aviva.

But what these mergers and acquisitions have also served to do is change the commercial and philosophical ecosystems of individual financial planners. People who consciously sought to avoid working under a major bank brand have found themselves doing so. Clearly there are planners working within the AXA framework who will be uncomfortable working under the AMP umbrella.

Is this a bad thing? Will it simply give rise to more independents and more boutiques?

These are questions that can and should be examined by the ACCC.

After examining the situation it may determine that it is not justified in acting. However, it owes it to the broader industry and consumers to ensure that the right questions are actually asked.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS