Letting go of the baggage

FPA fpa chief executive commissions fpa members financial planning association financial advisers financial planning industry AFA association of financial advisers chief executive federal government

18 May 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The move by the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) to not support the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) proposal to transition away from commissions-based financial advice would have come as little surprise to FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch.

In disagreeing with the FPA’s consultation paper proposing the move away from commissions, AFA national president Jim Taggart asserted that members did not want nor expect their professional body to tell them how to run their businesses.

Many members of the FPA will probably find themselves agreeing with Taggart. Indeed, in all likelihood, a number of those members will see fit to resign their membership of the FPA and sign up with the AFA.

But while Taggart may have spoken the very words that some FPA members have been thinking, he and his board are clearly viewing the AFA’s role as that of a traditional industry association rather than a professional body.

The FPA’s approach is more about being a professional association. Very much tied up in the FPA’s position on commissions is an acknowledgement that advice needs to be clearly separated from product sales before advisers can be seen to be truly independent and therefore lay claim to professionalism.

Therefore, as the debate moves forward, financial advisers will need to make a choice about how they perceive the future of their industry and, by definition, how their industry is perceived by consumers.

What needs to be understood by all concerned in the debate is the reality that the Federal Government was highly likely to have moved on the commissions issue if the industry had not.

It ought follow, therefore, that while changing industry organisations might give planners some small satisfaction, it is unlikely to alter the reality that the commissions regime, as it currently exists, is not politically sustainable.

The financial planning industry, as it is now constructed, is carrying with it a good deal of negative baggage. For better or worse, a change to the commissions regime represents a chance to jettison some of that baggage and the perceptions that go with it.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

21 hours 43 minutes ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 days 21 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

4 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS