Letting go of the baggage

FPA fpa chief executive commissions fpa members financial planning association financial advisers financial planning industry AFA association of financial advisers chief executive federal government

18 May 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The move by the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) to not support the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) proposal to transition away from commissions-based financial advice would have come as little surprise to FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch.

In disagreeing with the FPA’s consultation paper proposing the move away from commissions, AFA national president Jim Taggart asserted that members did not want nor expect their professional body to tell them how to run their businesses.

Many members of the FPA will probably find themselves agreeing with Taggart. Indeed, in all likelihood, a number of those members will see fit to resign their membership of the FPA and sign up with the AFA.

But while Taggart may have spoken the very words that some FPA members have been thinking, he and his board are clearly viewing the AFA’s role as that of a traditional industry association rather than a professional body.

The FPA’s approach is more about being a professional association. Very much tied up in the FPA’s position on commissions is an acknowledgement that advice needs to be clearly separated from product sales before advisers can be seen to be truly independent and therefore lay claim to professionalism.

Therefore, as the debate moves forward, financial advisers will need to make a choice about how they perceive the future of their industry and, by definition, how their industry is perceived by consumers.

What needs to be understood by all concerned in the debate is the reality that the Federal Government was highly likely to have moved on the commissions issue if the industry had not.

It ought follow, therefore, that while changing industry organisations might give planners some small satisfaction, it is unlikely to alter the reality that the commissions regime, as it currently exists, is not politically sustainable.

The financial planning industry, as it is now constructed, is carrying with it a good deal of negative baggage. For better or worse, a change to the commissions regime represents a chance to jettison some of that baggage and the perceptions that go with it.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 day 14 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 6 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

13 hours ago

Professional services group AZ NGA has made its first acquisition since announcing a $240 million strategic partnership with US manager Oaktree Capital Management in Sept...

1 day 17 hours ago