Investment choice to increase costs under FSRA
The Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) looks set to result in further compliance and legislative costs to superannuation funds offering member investment choice, warns an industry expert.
BT Financial Group senior vice president Dean Thomas says under section 1012ia of the FSRA, a fund that offers member investment choice is required to provide members with a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) prior to switching between investment choices.
“This cuts across all areas of wholesale superannuation and treats superannuation funds like Investor Directory Portfolio Services (IDPS).
“It will be extremely costly and time consuming for trustees to review all their investment options to allow the switching process to now comply with this provision, which is truly designed for custodial arrangements, not trustee arrangements,” Thomas says.
He says there has been no previous requirement to provide a PDS, as superannuation funds are wholesale investors and the trustee is the one making the investment decision and putting the investment strategy on the menu.
However, according to Thomas, the problem is that most funds have structured their arrangements to comply with regulation 402 of the SIS Act, which requires that they provide members with sufficient information to understand the risk and return about the investment prior to making the decision to switch. This has been achieved through annual reports, member statements, information packages and Web sites.
Thomas believes that Treasury has got it all wrong because it does not realise that superannuation is not a custodial function.
He argues against this ruling, noting if there was a deficiency in regulation 402 of the SIS Act, he has not heard about it and neither the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission have made any announcements.
While the decision was meant to take effect immediately from March 11 this year, lobbying by the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has managed to have it deferred until March 11, 2004.
Thomas is chairman of IFSA’s FSRA working group committee and says this committee will lobby Treasury in September when it starts its review. It will also provide a report outlining why the status quo should remain in place.
He suggests that superannuation funds write to Treasury asking for the changes to not be adopted. His committee will also approach the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia to participate in a joint submission, because the ruling will affect industry and corporate funds.
—Sarkis Khoury
AUTHOR
Sarkis Khoury
Recommended for you
In this new episode of The Manager Mix, host Laura Dew speaks to Nick Paul, institutional portfolio manager at MFS Investment Management to delve into everything small and mid-cap equities.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Kellie Wood, head of fixed income and deputy head of fixed income and multi-asset at Schroders Australia, to discuss why fixed income is returning to favour after a 12-year wait.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew speaks with Michael Hunstad, deputy chief investment officer and chief investment officer of global equities at Northern Trust Asset Management, to debunk myths around index investing.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Maja Garaca Djurdjevic chats with Robin Tsui, APAC gold strategist at State Street Global Advisors, to discuss gold’s role as a diversifier in portfolios.
