Intra-fund advice class order removal a relief
ASIC's guidance document on scalable advice should be welcomed for one thing, the manner in which it proposes to remove the class relief granted to superannuation fund trustees relating to provision of intra-fund advice.
If the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) guidance document on scalable advice should be welcomed for one thing, it should be welcomed for the manner in which it proposes to remove the class relief granted to superannuation fund trustees relating to provision of intra-fund advice.
By proposing to withdraw the class order relief, the regulator has clearly signalled it believes there should be a level playing field with uniform obligations imposed on those providing ‘scaled advice’, whether they are financial planners, accountants or superannuation fund trustees.
While much was made of the 2009 Government-backed decision to provide a class order allowing superannuation funds to provide ‘intra-fund’ advice, it ultimately proved to be little-used by superannuation fund trustees, with most opting to go down the route of more holistic advice.
One of the key elements of the ASIC approach to scalable advice is that it suggests the obligations imposed on those providing the advice will also be scalable with respect to the suitability of the advice for the client and the level of inquiry and analysis required.
However, the ASIC paper is silent on the issue of a ‘best interests’ test – something that has been raised as an issue of concern by the Financial Planning Association (FPA).
Given the potential complexity of the issues, the FPA is probably also right to be concerned about topics such as transition to retirement, Centrelink and retirement planning to be included within the broad gamut of scaled advice.
ASIC needs to be careful to ensure that the level playing field it will create by removing the class order relief granted to superannuation funds will not again be distorted by allowing too much scope for invention within the definition of scaled advice.
Then too, financial planners and others should note that the ASIC documentation makes frequent reference to the legislation that will evolve out of the Federal Government’s Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.
Implicit in those references is that whatever recommendations the regulator may have made within the discussion paper, the ultimate shape of the new scalable advice environment will depend on the content of the legislation the Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, ultimately introduces to the Parliament.
It is to be hoped, however, that the minister and his advisers have made themselves fully familiar with the ASIC discussion paper and, not least, its proposed removal of the 2009 class order relief. Financial advice, delivered from no matter what quarter, should be subject to uniform legislation and uniform regulation.
As superannuation funds move further and further into the competitive delivery of financial advice, they must be made to play by the rules.
Recommended for you
In this episode of Relative Return Unplugged, hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford are joined by special guest Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP, to break down what’s happening with the Trump trade and the broader global economy, and what it means for Australia.
In this episode, hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford take a look at what’s making news in the investment world, from President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations to Cbus fronting up to a Senate inquiry.
In this new episode of The Manager Mix, host Laura Dew speaks with Claire Smith, head of private assets sales at Schroders, to discuss semi-liquid global private equity.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew speaks with Eric Braz, MFS portfolio manager on the global small and mid-cap fund, the MFS Global New Discovery Strategy, to discuss the power of small and mid-cap investing in today’s global markets.