Industry Super Network attacks FPA's commission stance

industry-super-network/insurance/life-insurance/financial-planning-association/superannuation-funds/commissions/industry-superannuation-funds/financial-advice/default-funds/

29 March 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Network's spokesman David Whiteley has criticised the Financial Planning Association's position on commissions associated with the sale of life insurance.

As former 1960s UK callgirl Mandy Rice-Davies said: “Well he would say that, wouldn’t he?”

Such is the track record of Industry Super Network (ISN) spokesman David Whiteley that no one should be in the least bit surprised that he last week chose to attack the Financial Planning Association (FPA) over its support for commissions continuing to be paid with respect to insurance products.

Assuming Whiteley’s statement was not merely a Pavlovian response to the word ‘commission’, the ISN spokesman has clearly failed to understand the difference between commissions relating to the provision of financial advice and commissions relating to the sale of a product — insurance.

As well, Whiteley clearly fails to understand the limited nature of the insurance products offered via most superannuation funds, notwithstanding the fact that their suite of offerings has been gradually improving beyond the tradition of life insurance to include income protection and total and permanent disablement.

However, the reality remains that with the rare exception of funds such as REST, members have only limited ability to vary their coverage beyond a fixed template of offerings.

What is more, Whiteley’s comments fail to take account of the distinct differences between the group and personal insurance markets and the manner in which Australia’s underinsurance problem has continued largely unabated.

While it is true that advisers are paid a commission on the sale of insurance products, it is also true that they cannot hope to compete with superannuation funds on the basis of cost. It follows that advisers are mostly receiving commissions on the sale of insurance products not offered by funds.

Ironically, the companies paying commissions to planners on the sale of insurance products are those competing strongly on the group insurance mandates offered by industry superannuation funds — a mandate market so competitive that it can make a real difference to the decision-making of employers with respect to the selection of default funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND