Industry Super Network attacks FPA's commission stance

industry super network insurance life insurance financial planning association superannuation funds commissions industry superannuation funds financial advice default funds

29 March 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Network's spokesman David Whiteley has criticised the Financial Planning Association's position on commissions associated with the sale of life insurance.

As former 1960s UK callgirl Mandy Rice-Davies said: “Well he would say that, wouldn’t he?”

Such is the track record of Industry Super Network (ISN) spokesman David Whiteley that no one should be in the least bit surprised that he last week chose to attack the Financial Planning Association (FPA) over its support for commissions continuing to be paid with respect to insurance products.

Assuming Whiteley’s statement was not merely a Pavlovian response to the word ‘commission’, the ISN spokesman has clearly failed to understand the difference between commissions relating to the provision of financial advice and commissions relating to the sale of a product — insurance.

As well, Whiteley clearly fails to understand the limited nature of the insurance products offered via most superannuation funds, notwithstanding the fact that their suite of offerings has been gradually improving beyond the tradition of life insurance to include income protection and total and permanent disablement.

However, the reality remains that with the rare exception of funds such as REST, members have only limited ability to vary their coverage beyond a fixed template of offerings.

What is more, Whiteley’s comments fail to take account of the distinct differences between the group and personal insurance markets and the manner in which Australia’s underinsurance problem has continued largely unabated.

While it is true that advisers are paid a commission on the sale of insurance products, it is also true that they cannot hope to compete with superannuation funds on the basis of cost. It follows that advisers are mostly receiving commissions on the sale of insurance products not offered by funds.

Ironically, the companies paying commissions to planners on the sale of insurance products are those competing strongly on the group insurance mandates offered by industry superannuation funds — a mandate market so competitive that it can make a real difference to the decision-making of employers with respect to the selection of default funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS