Industry super funds: it's time to end the polemic

commissions industry funds industry super network industry super funds financial planning industry financial services association superannuation funds parliamentary joint committee financial advice financial planning association chairman

30 November 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

It is time for Industry Super Network's David Whiteley to put down the verbal cudgels and for his industry funds’ backers to cease their consequent expenditure of members’ funds.

The executive manager of the Industry Super Network, David Whiteley, is a polemicist.

Whiteley has been the mouthpiece of the industry funds movement in its campaign against the payment of commissions with respect to the provision of financial advice. He must be adjudged as doing his job well.

But one of the necessary skills in conducting a successful polemic is being able to recognise when the argument is won.

That being the case, it is time for Whiteley to put down the verbal cudgels and for his industry funds’ backers to cease their consequent expenditure of members’ funds.

With the Financial Planning Association having moved to phase out commissions, with the Investment and Financial Services Association having cemented its new superannuation charter and with the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (Ripoll inquiry) having delivered its report, it is time to declare a ceasefire.

If Whiteley and his industry fund mentors wanted any proof of the need to accept a truce, they need only have listened to the words of the Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen, and the chairman of the Ripoll inquiry, Bernie Ripoll.

Bowen told the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia conference earlier this month that it was time for superannuation funds to be thinking about the future of the industry rather than trying to gain a competitive advantage over other funds.

Similarly, Ripoll said the quality of financial advice mattered more than how clients paid for it.

The industry funds movement has spent many millions of dollars of its members’ money prosecuting a highly successful campaign. The evidence of that success is manifested in the level of membership growth achieved.

It is unlikely that the industry funds movement or, indeed, the financial planning industry will be pleased with all the recommendations of the Ripoll inquiry. Nonetheless, they should accept the broad outcome and dispense with the battles of the past.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

6 days 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS