Has the Rudd Government fumbled by largely rejecting the Henry Review?

financial services industry taxation industry superannuation funds australian financial services self-managed super funds superannuation guarantee

17 May 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

By holding the Henry Review into Taxation and then rejecting most of its findings, the Government has broken the golden rule of politics, writes Mike Taylor.

There is a golden rule in politics: never ask a question to which you don’t already know the answer.

The Rudd Government, no doubt congratulating itself on its political perspicacity, has been guilty of breaking that golden rule on multiple occasions.

Those who break golden rules deserve to be punished. In the case of the Rudd Government that punishment came in the form of the broad-ranging and sometimes unpalatable findings of the Henry Review into Taxation — something which explains the Government’s less than convincing attempt to provide its own answers.

It would have been churlish for the Australian financial services industry not to have welcomed the superannuation and ancillary measures announced in the Government’s response to the Henry Review but, in truth, those efforts could best be described as ‘limp wristed’ — amounting to a nine-year phasing-in of a lifting in the superannuation guarantee and the partial undoing of the contribution cap changes contained in last year’s Budget.

And there can be little doubt that many of the spokesmen who welcomed the super changes were, at the same time, calculating the potential damage to retirement income streams likely to flow from the Government’s introduction of a mining super profits tax — not least on those self-managed super funds holding high exposures to stocks such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto.

But the Government’s response to the Henry Review represented just an entrée to the main meal, which was this week’s Budget — the document that will form the basis of the Rudd administration’s bid for re-election.

And it is already quite clear that, except for the undue influence of industry superannuation funds, financial services will not represent a front-rank issue as the major political parties jockey to win electoral hearts.

The problem for the financial services industry, and financial planners in particular, is that the Government has posed more questions in the past four weeks than it has answered in the past two and a half years.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

20 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 6 days ago

Professional services group AZ NGA has made its first acquisition since announcing a $240 million strategic partnership with US manager Oaktree Capital Management in Sept...

23 hours 28 minutes ago