Focusing on choice issues

superannuation funds association of superannuation funds industry superannuation funds ASFA master trusts superannuation industry IFSA australian securities and investments commission

15 December 2005
| By Mike Taylor |

The underlying theme of this year’s Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) national conference in Melbourne is ‘Commonwealth’, but by ASFA’s own admission much of the interest will be focused on the issues that have been generated by the new choice of superannuation fund environment.

The ASFA conference is being held as the industry superannuation funds and a number of the master trusts continue their advertising campaigns aimed at retaining and recruiting members, while two start-ups — Virgin Super and Maxsuper — ruffle feathers among not only the existing superannuation funds and master trusts, but also the financial planning community.

Reflecting the underlying tensions being felt within the superannuation industry, ASFA four weeks before the conference pointed to a debate to be held on the second day between the principals of the four agencies who make a practice of rating Australia’s major superannuation funds and master trusts — Jeff Bresnahan from SuperRatings, Warren Chant from Chant West, Alex Dunnin from Intech and Wayne Walker from Rice Walker.

In the words of the ASFA media release, “sparks are sure to fly” as the four principals give their views and then their methodologies are assessed by ASFA’s Principal Researcher, Ross Clare.

“The criteria and features utilised by the ratings agencies can be controversial, and choice of fund raises the stakes for consumers and the industry alike,” the ASFA promotional material said.

What makes the debate really interesting, however, is that Chant and Bresnahan are being seen as holding some of the opposing views reflected in the approaches adopted by the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) and Industry Fund Services.

Chant made those views clear at the IFSA national conference in August when he suggested that the “net benefit to members” calculation being utilised by the industry superannuation funds could be misleading — something that prompted the executive chair of Industry Fund Services, Garry Weaven, to threaten to refer Chant’s claims to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Bresnahan is expected to have to defend the “net benefit to members” methodology because the industry fund advertisements are largely based on data compiled by SuperRatings.

What delegates to the conference are likely to find interesting is Clare’s independent assessment of their methodologies, particularly in circumstances where he has signalled that he will be pointing out their strengths and weaknesses.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 1 hour ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS