Equity and effectiveness should trump cost-savings

9 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government has commissioned a timely review of the external dispute resolution (EDR) schemes covering financial services, but it should focus more on equity and effectiveness than penny-pinching.

If they have not done so already, then financial planners should be ensuring that they are fully acquainted with the terms of reference and likely outcomes of the Government's review of external dispute resolution (EDR) and complaints schemes. 

The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer, released the terms of reference for the review at the same time as allowing the three-person independent panel a three-month extension allowing them to report at the end of March, 2017. 

The review panel, chaired by Professor Ian Ramsay, with Alan Kirkland and Julie Abramson as members, would be examining the role, powers, governance, and accountability of the existing financial system external dispute resolution and complaints bodies: the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), the Credit and Investments Ombudsman (CIO), and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT). 

Why should financial planners and their representative organisations be paying close attention to the processes and probable findings of the review? Because financial planners have a regulatory obligation to be members of an EDR scheme and, frankly, the relationship between many planners and FOS over the past decade or so has been problematic to say the least. 

What first has to be said about FOS is that it is mostly funded by the industry it sits in judgement upon and its decisions are not open to appeal to the courts.  

On this basis, superannuation fund executives should also be paying close attention, in circumstances where, unlike the FOS, the SCT has operated as a Government-funded statutory authority with its decisions capable of appeal. 

Both advisers and superannuation fund trustees should therefore note that the terms of reference outlined by O'Dwyer last week made direct reference to the review having regard to: efficiency; equity; complexity; transparency; accountability; comparability of outcomes; and regulatory costs.  

The wording of the terms of reference, undoubtedly written by Treasury, leaves little doubt that just as the Government has been attracted to an industry-funded Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), it is equally attracted to keeping EDR services off-Budget. 

A logical starting point for the panel ought to be the processes which gave rise to the current EDR regime and whether the structures remain fit for purpose. 

FOS chief ombudsman, Shane Tregillis, is nothing if not a vigorous advocate for his organisation but the panel needs to not only look at the positives Tregillis seeks to espouse but the economics of running FOS, whether it is properly scaled, whether its decisions are appropriately considered and balanced and whether its funding structure fit for purpose. 

Perhaps, too, the independent panel might consider whether, in the interests of equity and good risk management, FOS decisions should be open to appeal in a court of law. 

It is greatly to be hoped that the review of EDR and complaints schemes pursues genuine improvement rather than short-sighted cost savings. 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 5 days ago