Enshrinement of 'financial planner' - an improvement but not a panacea

senator-mathias-cormann/financial-planning-industry/financial-planning/FOFA/financial-advice/australian-financial-services/money-management/

4 April 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

It was appropriate that the Government’s introduction of the legislation necessary to enshrine the term ‘financial planner/adviser’ coincided with the holding of the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF), because it represented the anniversary of the deal which sealed key elements of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.    

It was during the 2012 CMSF conference that reports emerged that a deal had been struck capable of convincing the cross-benchers in the Parliament to support passage of the FOFA bills, including opt-in. 

This is probably why the Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann, was last week remaining less than enthusiastic about supporting the passage of the ‘enshrinement’ legislation. 

Discussing the issue with Money Management last week, Cormann said he still believed the FOFA opt-in provisions would have been defeated in the House of Representatives if the deal entailing ‘enshrinement’ had not been struck. 

Beyond his belief that the underlying deal which led to ‘enshrinement’ was politically unsavoury, Cormann continues to argue that enshrinement of the term ‘financial planner/adviser’ is not warranted and sets an undesirable precedent. 

He points out that no similar ‘enshrinement’ applies to the term ‘accountant’, and that planning groups could act to protect the status of planners/advisers via existing mechanisms, including via the use of Australian Financial Services Licences (AFSL). 

On this basis, Cormann would like to see the ‘enshrinement’ legislation sent off to a Parliamentary Committee – something likely to see it fail to fully pass the Parliament before the forthcoming Federal election. 

However, in the event the legislation does pass the Parliament it seems unlikely a Coalition Government would find the necessary motivation to repeal it. 

The bottom line for planners, of course, is that irrespective of how the ‘enshrinement’ legislation was extracted from a Labor Party Government, it will ultimately prove to be of benefit to the planning industry. There is little doubt that it will help identify and remove the unqualified spivs and carpet-baggers. 

However, the planning industry will need to be careful that oversight of the preferred status of the term ‘financial planner’ is not used to bolster the membership structure of any single organisation. 

The financial planning industry has suffered severe reputational damage over the past decade. Enshrinement is not a panacea – but it must certainly help.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week 5 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND